PDA

View Full Version : N. Korea offers olive branch to Bush


madape
05-04-2004, 08:56 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2000/ASIANOW/east/06/09/putin.nkorea.01/link.kim.jong.il.jpg

"We don't want to suffer the fate of Iraq,"

N Korea offers US pledge on weapons
By Victor Mallet in Hong Kong
Published: May 3 2004 21:55 | Last Updated: May 3 2004 21:55


North Korea, probably the world's most secretive and isolated nation, has offered an olive branch to the US by promising never to sell nuclear materials to terrorists, calling for Washington's friendship and saying it does not want to suffer the fate of Iraq.


Senior members of the communist regime have spelt out proposals for solving the simmering crisis over their nuclear weapons programmes in an unusually frank series of interviews with Selig Harrison, the Washington-based Korean expert.

Although their statements will be treated with scepticism in Washington, they suggest a reasoned view of international affairs in sharp contrast to the simplistic, bellicose and anti-American rhetoric used by junior officials and relayed to the world by the North Korean news agency.

In Mr Harrison's first-hand report, published in Tuesday's FT, North Korean leaders explicitly condemn al-Qaeda, and categorically reject US accusations that they would be willing to transfer nuclear technology to the Islamist terror group - or to anyone else.

Kim Yong-nam, deputy to North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, said in a two-hour interview: "We're entitled to sell missiles to earn foreign exchange.

"But in regard to nuclear material our policy past, present and future is that we would never allow such transfers to al-Qaeda or anyone else. Never."

Paik Nam-soon, foreign minister, denounced al-Qaeda and other terrorists and said George W. Bush, US president, was using the shock of the September 11 attacks to turn Americans against North Korea. But he said: " The truth is that we want and need your friendship."

Mr Kim rejected the notion that North Korea would never give up nuclear weapons. He argued that Pyongyang - branded by Mr Bush as part of the "axis of evil" - was developing nuclear weapons purely to deter a US attack. "We don't want to suffer the fate of Iraq," he told Mr Harrison.

Mr Harrison, director of the Asia programme at the Centre for International Policy in Washington, has been highly critical of the Bush administration's hardline policy towards North Korea and enjoys exceptional access to the North Korean leaders.

He reports that the North Koreans firmly rejected the idea of immediately dismantling their nuclear programmes, insisted on a phased process with concessions on each side, and threw no light on how far they had developed weapons or how their actions could be verified.

Mr Kim told Mr Harrison he thought Mr Bush was delaying resolution of the North Korean issue because of the war in Iraq and the US presidential election later this year.

But he said: "Time is not on his side. We are going to use this time 100 per cent effectively to strengthen our nuclear deterrent both quantitatively and qualitatively. Why doesn't he accept our proposal to dismantle our programme completely and verifiably through simultaneous steps by both sides?"

Mr Harrison, on his eighth visit to the country, said he was struck by the "social ferment" resulting from Kim Jong-il's economic reforms after decades of rigid state control.

The benefits of reform, however, were unevenly spread, with farmers profiting from free markets but those on fixed wages suffering the effects of inflation.

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1083180244930

Chiwas
05-04-2004, 09:38 AM
...was developing nuclear weapons purely to deter a US attack.It surely will do it.

I was wondering, if Saddam had had a nuclear bomb, had he used it? Or, if Saddam had had nuclear bombs, had the US attacked him?

I think both answers are no.

FishForLunch
05-04-2004, 09:51 AM
Ahh, What a sweet man. I predict he will become the lefts darling like Cuba

Mavdog
05-04-2004, 09:59 AM
Mr Kim rejected the notion that North Korea would never give up nuclear weapons. He argued that Pyongyang - branded by Mr Bush as part of the "axis of evil" - was developing nuclear weapons purely to deter a US attack. "We don't want to suffer the fate of Iraq," he told Mr Harrison

Their conclusion is that they need to have nukes because of the invasion of Iraq, rather than they want to give up their nukes because of Iraq.

They are very paranoid and insecure, and they are seeking a US security guarantee. Is it time to provide to North Korea such guarantee of their security for them to stop their enrichment/bomb making program?

We would in effect be guaranteeing Kim Jong-il's place as "Revered Leader" for the rest of his life (or until some N. Korean removes him) by doing so...