PDA

View Full Version : GS v. SA game watch


Windmill360
04-10-2005, 09:10 PM
You can expect the Spurs fans to salivate if they win this one.

53-49 Golden State at half time.

capitalcity
04-10-2005, 09:32 PM
I wonder what Beno Udrich did to piss off Pop - he ain't played but 4 minutes the night after parker played 50.

TVI
04-10-2005, 09:51 PM
Originally posted by: Windmill360
You can expect the Spurs fans to salivate if they win this one.

53-49 Golden State at half time.And well they should... Down two starters, one of them just happens to be arguably the best player in the NBA, playing on the second night of a back to back (after a double OT win), on the road, against a team that's won 8 in a row and 10 of their last 11. Man, that would be a seriously impressive win.


Originally posted by: capitalcity
I wonder what Beno Udrich did to piss off Pop - he ain't played but 4 minutes the night after parker played 50.Beno seems to have hit a wall about 1 to 1.5 months ago. I don't think he's in the doghouse. He's just not playing as well as he did early in the season.

Windmill360
04-10-2005, 10:50 PM
Game might go into 2OT again, of course it's just like a west coast team to screw it up for us huh?

StylisticS
04-10-2005, 10:54 PM
game going to the 2nd OT tied at 130.

mary
04-10-2005, 11:05 PM
1:36 left in 2OT, and there's been a grand total of 4 points scored. Both teams must be exhausted.

mary
04-10-2005, 11:06 PM
Both teams just scored again...could be heading into triple OT!! Damn I wish this was on tv.

Windmill360
04-10-2005, 11:08 PM
SAN has the ball with 16 sec left, timeout.

mary
04-10-2005, 11:10 PM
And Paker drives for a layup...2.0 seconds left on the clock.

Oh well, moving up was a pipe dream anyway.

Simon2
04-10-2005, 11:12 PM
Come on GS!!

TVI
04-10-2005, 11:24 PM
Originally posted by: TVI
And well they should... Down two starters, one of them just happens to be arguably the best player in the NBA, playing on the second night of a back to back (after a double OT win), on the road, against a team that's won 8 in a row and 10 of their last 11. Man, that would be a seriously impressive win.

I stand corrected. They were down three starters. Ginobili didn't play tonight either...

dirno2000
04-10-2005, 11:26 PM
As much as it pains me to say it, these were two big wins for SA. The 40 point loss at the AAC may have been the kick in the arse they needed.

Simon2
04-10-2005, 11:53 PM
Well, what can you expect from the Warriors and the Clippers? At least they took them into double overtime.

TVI
04-11-2005, 12:06 AM
Originally posted by: Simon2
Well, what can you expect from the Warriors and the Clippers? At least they took them into double overtime.Uhh, the Clipps don't suck at home, and the Warriors had won 11 of their last 12 games, beating the likes of Phoenix (twice), Houston, Seattle, and Sacramento (twice). Tonight, they were shooting for a team record 9 straight wins.

This win was gigantic for the Spurs, who played without three of their starters, including their two all-stars.

That being said, they probably won't continue to win many games giving up 134 points. If you'd told me the Spurs were going to score 125 point one night, and 136 points the very next night, I'd have told you you were crazy.

Who'da thunk it?

Simon2
04-11-2005, 12:22 AM
I don't know about that. No matter how well they play 3/4 of the game, they will remember who they are and do some bonehead plays. I do have to admit that the Clipps put up a good fight the other day. They just ran out of players. Like, I said, at least they took the Spurs into 2 double overtimes. Parker must be exhausted by now.


Originally posted by: TVI

Originally posted by: Simon2
Well, what can you expect from the Warriors and the Clippers? At least they took them into double overtime.Uhh, the Clipps don't suck at home, and the Warriors had won 11 of their last 12 games, beating the likes of Phoenix (twice), Houston, Seattle, and Sacramento (twice). Tonight, they were shooting for a team record 9 straight wins.

This win was gigantic for the Spurs, who played without three of their starters, including their two all-stars.

That being said, they probably won't continue to win many games giving up 134 points. If you'd told me the Spurs were going to score 125 point one night, and 136 points the very next night, I'd have told you you were crazy.

Who'da thunk it?

Windmill360
04-11-2005, 12:26 AM
Makes our wins look better anyways.

capitalcity
04-11-2005, 12:31 AM
If I were a spurs fan - I would've rather traded 2 losses in regulation for the end result. Yeah the spurs gutted out to victories but at a hefty price. The two 2OT wins aren't as great when paired with the loss of Rasho and the exhaustion of Ginobilli and Parker.

TVI
04-11-2005, 01:37 AM
Originally posted by: capitalcity
If I were a spurs fan - I would've rather traded 2 losses in regulation for the end result. Yeah the spurs gutted out to victories but at a hefty price. The two 2OT wins aren't as great when paired with the loss of Rasho and the exhaustion of Ginobilli and Parker.The double OT games really only affected Parker. Parker definitely logged major minutes, but Manu didn't play tonight, and Rasho twisted his ankle in the third quarter of the Clipps game.