Quote:
Originally Posted by Thespiralgoeson
They run the floor better, that's about it. Offensively, you're not getting anymore out of either of them than Dampier. Defensively, in both cases your helpside gets better, and your man-to-man gets a bit worse. In Chandler's case, rebounding is about the same, maybe slightly better (or worse.) Andersen OTOH is definitely a poorer rebounder than Damp. Neither of them give you much more than Dampier does. Chandler is a lateral move, and I might honestly go as far as to call Andersen a slight DOWNGRADE.
|
Yeah, they offer more offensively the both of them. Andersen has a much better shot than Damp who is considered fortunate to draw iron on any form of shots outside of a layup. He can actually knock down the short-mid J. Damp has zero chance of doing that. Chandler is much more potent on the pick and roll than Damp, and while the lob play is his thing I would prefer either of those two creating offense with the dribble over Damp. Both of them have MUCH better hands too.
Defensively the difference in man to man between them is so small it's not even worth a debate. Rebounding too. The things that make them an upgrade is mobility and offense which definitely includes being able to handle passes much better too. Offensively Damp brings one thing: Setting nice picks.