It's a two-way street. There are certain posters on this board who have not ONE time admitted JJB has had a horrible, let alone "bad" game. It's funny how you sugar-coat things Jthig.
"The team was simply out-manned and got beat. It happens. Gooden was awful, Thomas was awful, Roddy was meh, Humphries was meh, Barea was helpful offensively but couldn't be hidden defensively."
So those guys were awful...but JJB was helpful on offensive and couldn't be hidden on defense? That's interesting writing. So you couldn't say JJB was bad, or JJB was solid on offense, but awful on defense? You go out of your way to make an excuse or pre-cursor for JJB. He "couldn't be hidden defensively". Yes, that tends to be true when you play a lousy defender.
|