Quote:
Originally Posted by CadBane
It's a two-way street. There are certain posters on this board who have not ONE time admitted JJB has had a horrible, let alone "bad" game. It's funny how you sugar-coat things Jthig.
"The team was simply out-manned and got beat. It happens. Gooden was awful, Thomas was awful, Roddy was meh, Humphries was meh, Barea was helpful offensively but couldn't be hidden defensively."
So those guys were awful...but JJB was helpful on offensive and couldn't be hidden on defense? That's interesting writing. So you couldn't say JJB was bad, or JJB was solid on offense, but awful on defense? You go out of your way to make an excuse or pre-cursor for JJB. He "couldn't be hidden defensively". Yes, that tends to be true when you play a lousy defender.
|
wtf. It's clearly not a two way street because the complaint is that every single conversation is being reframed into what Barea did or did not do. There's one poster on this entire board that constantly reframes the dialogue into that, and it's you. I don't know what gives with your obsession, or your bizarre claim to have read every one of these "certain poster's" thousands on thousands of posts. But you are a serious hinderance to any hopes of intelligent dialogue on this board when you consistently keep shuffling intelligent conversation into "lets enumerate all the things Barea did wrong today regardless of what actually happened in the game" mode.