View Single Post
Old 02-25-2010, 12:57 AM   #146
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sike View Post
Haywood is just as good defensively if not better than Damp

and is at least twice as good as offensive player.

That is a huge upgrade in my opinion....because I think Damp is a pretty dang good defensive center.
From a defensive perspective he is more agile, which in today's game is more valuable.

In a vacuum I don't know that Haywood is THAT much better than Damp offensively. The big difference is the hands and the instincts to get open and ready for a pass. But in this offense, with Kidd, it makes Haywood a significantly better offensive player.

As far as other aspects of the game, I don't know that Haywood's a better rebounder than Damp, in fact historically Damp has been a better rebounder. But this year at least, Haywood has shown an ability to stay on the court far more consistently than Damp.

But let's all remember how great this team was defensively this year when Damp was healthy. A Haywood/Damp center rotation is going to be so, so delicious.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote