View Single Post
Old 06-30-2010, 09:44 PM   #33
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalger View Post
Is this really a good thing for the Spurs? They no longer have a small forward (having Jefferson is perhaps better than having nobody...), just lost a massive $15 million trade chip and only have the MLE and LLE to make up for it. They could have used that money to add someone of importance to last year's team. Now they'll have to use (parts of) it to get back to last year's level instead of improving the team.

Our situation with Kidd last year was somewhat similar: Had he left and gone to New York, we would have been forced to use parts of our available pieces (Stack & MLE) for a new point guard and couldn't have added Marion and Gooden to a team WITH Kidd.
Yes, it is a very, very, very good thing.

Hell they can re-sign RJ for a much more reasonable contract if they want him back so badly.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote