View Single Post
Old 12-14-2010, 02:32 AM   #312
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sike View Post
There you go. I understand this is how you think. This is your opinion.

And I'm telling you, that I think to world class athletes (not statisticians) that game 7 is VERY different than game 5. Not "kinda different", or a "tad different".

I also think your Rangers glasses made you see a series that was much closer than the one I saw. And we both know Lee didn't have any Rangers glasses. He just saw terrible at bat after terrible at bat. And a line up that had to grind to scratch out runs against his old team that scored them in droves against the Rangers.

Disagree with me...and use words like "fluky" to describes the difference between losing in game 7 and being 1 game from being swept, but don't say it is lacking in sense.
The Philly offense got shut down even worse by the same Giant staff. So that doesn't fly with me as a reason either.

Losing in five games and losing in seven...I just can't believe that anyone thinks that's enough of a difference to change where he wants to play for the next six seasons. That would be the ultimate knee jerk.

For the record, when I say "doesn't make sense" that means it doesn't make sense to me. It does not necessarily mean that the poster is lacking in sense. I'll try to make it a point to type the full thing out from now on.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com

Last edited by jthig32; 12-14-2010 at 02:33 AM.
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote