Quote:
Originally Posted by Budapest Maverick
No it's actually not, and no, he's not easily one of the top 10 players ever.
|
Yes, it actually is, and yes, he is. Easily. None of the lame excuses or meaningless hypothetical scenarios in the world can change history. "If you switched Player A with Player B..." It's meaningless bullsh*t. And I don't need to use the "weak rings argument" because I don't have to. His numbers alone compare favorably to anyone else's in NBA history. And beyond that I don't even need to look up his numbers to know how good he is because I have eyes. If you want to argue that someone like Duncan has had a greater career over the same time period, then fine. I don't necessarily have a problem with that. But to say that he is anything less than one the best players in the history of the game is just asinine. He's the second greatest ever at his position, and that puts him pretty f*cking high on the list overall.