View Single Post
Old 07-01-2011, 05:20 PM   #727
grndmstr_c
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,938
grndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond reputegrndmstr_c has a reputation beyond repute
Default

endrity, the catch is this. Winners of multi-possession games can be approximately determined by taking stock of which team had a higher proportion of won possessions. As the number of possessions that go into that per-game sample proportion increases, the difference between that sample proportion and the true probability of winning a given possession will tend to decrease, with the net result being that the better team will win a majority of the possessions more and more often. You're correct about the sample proportion zeroing in on the true mean probability of winning a single possession, but the standard deviation of that sample proportion is shrinking at a root N rate (the same root N that I noted in my last post), and that's what ends up making the difference.
__________________
"He's coming off the bench aggressive right away, looking for his shot. If he has any daylight, we need him to shoot the ball. We know it's going in."
-Dirk Nowitzki on Jason Terry, after JET's 16 point 4th quarter against the Pacers.
grndmstr_c is offline   Reply With Quote