View Single Post
Old 05-15-2012, 09:02 AM   #53
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BGMaverick9 View Post
If they don't use the amnesty on Roddy or Jones this year (which I would expect to be the case), why would they do it next summer? Unless I'm totally missing something, they can just nix the team option on Jones and likely just rescind the QO for Roddy if you really want to rid yourself of their deals.
Yeah, that's not what I meant. I worded that entire post poorly.

What I meant to say is that if Haywood (and to a lesser extent, Marion) is still on the team next season, you can pretty much guarantee that they won't use the amnesty on Jones or Roddy. You'll want to keep the amnesty in tact, in case you want to use it on Haywood NEXT off season. Or the one after that.

Basically I'm saying that Haywood' contract has the potential to become much more cumbersome if you burn your amnesty on a piddling contract like Roddy or Jones.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com

Last edited by jthig32; 05-15-2012 at 09:02 AM.
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote