Quote:
Originally Posted by marc9211
I could be wrong but I don't think either will be any more than a role player off the bench. Larkin has a better three and with this team as far as I'm concerned id rather have the shooter.
|
My problem is we went for the good player that can play now with lower upside. Schroder obviously has more upside. And we've got 2 or 3 point guards ahead of Larkin. He won't play now anyway!
I guess part of the reason we got Larkin was saving money by getting rid of cunningham and getting him with a lower draft pick, all for the pie in the sky dream of Howard.
I hope he proves me wrong, but giannis at small forward (isn't small forward another need with Marion at 35?) or Schroder sure look like potential stars that we past on......... and the Mavs are supposed to know the international kids better than anyone.