07-03-2016, 02:17 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Underdog
I don't get how a 1% chance at Barnes for $22m is a better idea than a 100% chance at Parsons for $22m, unless Parsons' knees are toast... Because injuries aside, Parsons is the better player. I like Barnes' versatility, but he's just not worth 25% of the cap.
|
+1
|
|
|