Thread: Nerlens Noel
View Single Post
Old 07-28-2017, 12:13 PM   #385
SMC0007
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: uranus
Posts: 13,489
SMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond reputeSMC0007 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan_Wilson View Post
No idea why a bridge would be burned between noel and dallas if they don't max him or near max him when not 1 team was/has been willing to do so. It's not like in baseball how a 1st rounder is attached to them, or in football where u can franchise them. He was not forced into a bad situation by Dallas and we haven't treated him poorly by any report coming out. He and his agent had the opp to negotiate the best deal possible. There is no burning of a bridge when the market didn't value him like he and his agent thought.

And I don't think there is precedent for it but that's not because players get disgruntled and leave it's because in the past u either were a max player or u weren't. And those that weren't got the best offers possible and brought them to their team to match. NN was not offered a max, or a near max it would seem... and his agent and he thought he would be. And he has not presented the best offer from another team for us to match because they thought waiting on the bigger dominoes to fall would open the market up for them. That is what it looks like anyway, and yet for some reason we are supposed to just set a new precedent apparently and just start paying our RFA's whatever they want regardless of what the market says otherwise a bridge is burned.
Well, on NBA2K you can...
__________________


you just proofed how stupid you are - CRAZYBOY
SMC0007 is offline   Reply With Quote