View Single Post
Old 02-14-2004, 06:24 PM   #10
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default RE:When will the Mainstream Media pull their head out of its ...

Quote:
Personal character is and always will be a legitimate issue in elections....Voters who don't value personal character, or who, for example, don't place a high value on marital fidelity as an indicator of personal character, are free to discount these issues. But the voters who do are completely within their right and reason to do so.
Personal character should be one of the criteria in evaluating a candidate. Personal character is not decided however on if a person is active sexually (which frankly is an issue between he and his spouse), it is a deeper question.
To make as factual rumors such as this which have NO evidence shows more about those who publicize the rumors than those who the rumor is about.

Quote:
Kerry's alleged indiscretions would have occurred within the last 2-3 years, if I'm reading the timeline correctly, which would mean that his propensity to lie to his wife his very recent, perhaps even current and ongoing
So now Kerry has not only been judged guilty of an affair (lack of any true evidence? "screw the facts" they scream) but also lying to his wife (were there those who heard the conversations between husband and wife? "screw the facts" they scream). Rush to judgement by those who are adept at the use of personal attack politics...doesn't it make you question the "personal character" of those who use these personal attacks on their opponent?
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote