Thread: Equal Rights
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2004, 11:31 PM   #33
LRB
Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 17,057
LRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to beholdLRB is a splendid one to behold
Default RE:Equal Rights

Quote:
Originally posted by: TheBaron
Quote:
Originally posted by: dude1394
It may be bizarre, but if marrying is a civil right, doesn't that person have a civil right to marry a "dog", "corpse", "child". ????
Ah! The slippery slope argument!

There is a fundamental difference between marrying someone you love, share feelings with and share a life with and a dog, child or corpse.

Do you see it?
Of course there is a difference. However if we include same sex marriage solely on the basis of not desriminating against a group of people, then the same argument could be applied to those groups who wish to marry a dog or a child or a corpse. I would think that they would be a much smaller minority than homosexuals, but the question would be why would the argument for not discriminating stop with these groups?
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
LRB is offline   Reply With Quote