View Single Post
Old 03-02-2004, 01:12 PM   #18
madape
Diamond Member
 
madape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,913
madape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to beholdmadape is a splendid one to behold
Default RE:Kerry Vows to Repair Foreign Relations

Quote:
All I know is that what has been done has not worked...if "trust" in the Pakistanis is what will get to him, I'm more than willing to do so. The goal is to get our hands on Bin Laden isn't it? Our troops haven't succeeded. A prejudice to not involve others isn't helping the effort...
Sorry Mavdog, what DIDN'T work was Clinton's (and Kerry's) law enforcement approach. Before Bush declared war on terror, we were blindsided with massacre after massacre by these murdering fucks. Kenya, Cole, 9/11.... Al Qaeda thrived under Clinton. Taliban leaders gleefully helped Bin Laden kill Americans with no fear of repercussions. The Saudis funneled millions into his coffers, and into the coffers of Palestinian terror orgizations who's mission is to murder Jews. That all changed when Bush declared war. It never would have changed if Gore were elected, and it is in danged of happening again if Kerry somehow shams his way into office. How many Americans need to die before we decided this joke of a foriegn policy wasn't working? Does Kerry not care that this failed policy has already cost us the lives of thousands of our countrymen? Does Kerry really want to revert back to the time when the federal government casually accepted the murder of innocent US women and children in the name of diplomacy? Since we declared war, there hasn't been one single incident of terror on US soil. Not one. By recent accounts, we've killed or captured over 70% of Al-Qaeda leadership. We've overthrown two regimes who supported terrorist activites. We've used the threat of military action to extract concessions out of several other countries who may have otherwise harboring or funding terrorist groups, or building weapons that could eventually send New York or Tel Aviv up in nuclear flame. The only black mark on Bush's war on terror is that Osama Bin Laden has not been captured. If he's not dead already, ihe s clearly in the crosshairs. We'll probably catch him before summer, but regardless, his terror network is almost completley incapacitated. We need to carry on Bush's fight until every last muderer is in prison.

There is no denying that with the exception of capturing Osama, the war on terror has to this point been a flawless success. Once the inevitable happens, and Osama is captured, there will be no denying that Bush was right, and Clinton, Kerry and the diplomats on the left were wrong. Now these pacificts are left in the despicable position of having to root for Osama to elude capture... and to root for more American deaths at the hands of these fucks. If things go the way the Democrats hope, maybe they can point at Bush's war and claim that it has been a failure. But right now? The people who say such things should be regarded as fools.

madape is offline   Reply With Quote