Quote:
If you "read this entire thread" then you should have seen this "compelling argument":
"I'm not seeing "good commentary" in using cliches such as "Great White whale", "doofuses", conjecturing that Teddy was making his speech up on the podium when Wes thought he was "trying to decide whether to make the comparison to either Hitler or Attila the Hun".
Pruden can make his point without that sort of fiction."
|
These comments have nothing to do with your position taken later in the thread that Nixon is the most "immoral" and "criminal" politician ever.
Quote:
With this "factual response":
"None of these who received clemency were convicted of any bombings or murders BTW. "
|
Again, this has nothing to do with Nixon or Kennedy.
Quote:
And this one that has both:
" You're referring to Kennedy? Absolutely wrong....Nixon was much more immoral, Adam Clayton Powell as well. The list is full of many more who betrayed the public trust. "
|
Here, we have your conclusory opinion that Nixon was more immoral than Kennedy, unsupported by either facts or compelling argument. This is exactly what I was talking about.
Quote:
|
As for Nixon, I can't name anyone he "kill[ed]". Is that the criteria?
|
Everyone can name someone that Kennedy killed. I suppose you believe it is "more criminal" and "more immoral" to be involved in a cover-up than it is to kill someone and THEN cover it up?