View Single Post
Old 08-13-2004, 01:10 PM   #10
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default RE:Cheney Mocks Kerry's 'Sensitive' War on Terror

Quote:
Originally posted by: LRB
Get a clue Mavdog, it is not the word sensitive that is in question, but the context that it was used in. You've presented a vastly different context for comparison. Perhaps if Mr. kerry would provide more specifics than vague generalities about what he meant by sensitive, then we could more easily clear up this issue. However Kerry's way is not to easily tie himself down to one position because that makes fense sitting more difficult.
So LRB finally understands that it is the context that should be examined.
Is it "vastly different"? well, in many ways, just as the connotation of Cheney's use is different than what kerry said.
But that difference didn't stop the attack dog that is our VP.
Is Kerry saying that he will be more "sensitive" towards the terrorists such as Cheney equates in his speech?
Absolutely not.
Kerry is using the word "sensitive" to how he would work with the world in the battle against terrorism.
Any rational person can deduce that.
That however didn't stop Cheney.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote