Quote:
|
It is a fact. A fact that there was not enough discomfort in her area to prevent her from having sex soon after allegedly being raped by Kobe. This has already been established, unless the semen found in her panties was planted. How you could even bring up this point for debate is just an example of how much you love to hear yourself ramble on. How you could say this is a lie is just plain sad. Nobody knows how much discomfort, if any, she felt except her but the FACT is it wasn't enough to prevent her from having sex soon after being with Kobe, Why? Because she did, plain and simple.
|
This is in no way, shape, nor form an established fact that she had sex after the alledged rape and before the rape exam. This is pure and simple conjecture based on a single piece of evidence which has a multitude of possible explanations with her having sex in that time frame only one of many explanations which might account for that semen being present on her underwear. Remember it was on her underwear and not inside her that the nonKobe semen was found. Also remember that kobe semen was found inside her. That none of the 2nd semen was found in her is a fact which offers a serious contradictory question to you speculative assumption that she had sex after the alledged rape. That is why is is important to hear all relevant facts before jumping to some prejudiced and uninformed decision which you did. Perhaps your time might be better spent educating yourself further on the differences between fact and conjecture rather that posting uniformed and slanderous statements about women who have said that they have been raped and with whom a grand jury has agreed.