View Single Post
Old 09-14-2004, 08:36 AM   #39
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default RE:Powell admits "no direct connection" between Saddam and 9/11

Quote:
Originally posted by: sturm und drang
Oh, do remove your Bush-colored glasses!
A "non-story"? I beg to differ.
. . .
A "non-story"? If Bush had admitted the same and stopped conflating 9/11 and Saddam – a smoke-and-mirrors tactic he has relied heavily on, as recently as the RNC – then perhaps a "non-story."
You posted the article at the beginning of the thread in which:
Quote:
But at the time President Bush said, "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11 [attacks]. What the vice president said was that he has been involved with al Qaeda."
You are wearing colored glasses.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote