View Single Post
Old 11-10-2004, 09:49 PM   #17
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default RE:One person's "terrorist" is another's Peace Award winner

Quote:
Originally posted by: kg_veteran
I'm not sure what your point is. Are you taking the position that we should consult with Britain on how we should formulate our terror screening policies?
more than "how we should formulate our screening policies" it is a question of in light of the flagging of a non-terrorist as a terrorist, the diversion of a plane to remove the non-terrorist and the ultimate expulsion of that non-terrorist, what is the basis of these clearly incorrect "screening policies".

Quote:
Again, what's your point? You're just arguing from hindsight and saying that they made a mistake. Assuming that to be the case, why do you have a problem with the steps they took to ensure that he wasn't a threat?
They were so clearly in error., and they should have seen it before they went to such lengths, especially before they deported the guy. It shows gross incompetence.

Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote