Quote:
|
Recall that North destroyed all the records that would have proved Reagan's guilt
|
They could just as easily have proven his innocence. The fact is we don't know exactly what was or was not in those documents. It's pure and unadulterated conjecture on your part to say that they would have proven Reagan guilty. To the best of my recollection Reagan claimed not to have been aware of the actions of North and company until after the fact. But it doesn't suprise me the way you're making statements that he did with your long history of misquotes and taking things out of context in order to twist them to your point. You also have a equally long history of claiming something and providing no links to where it was said. In short Mavdog you have proven to be a most unreliable source who can't be trusted without verification.
However we do know for a fact that Clinton commited a felony, pejury. It doesn't matter whether you think the question was relevant or not, the judge thought it was or it would not have been allowed. Clinton lied under oath, thereby committing a felony.