View Single Post
Old 02-14-2006, 01:23 PM   #8
mcsluggo
Golden Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 1,970
mcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant futuremcsluggo has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drbio
So you know what is best for the country or state over the will of the people? Seems like the will of the people would be more correct or just than the will of mavdog.

A democracy is not a simple "hands for, hands against" system. A primary function of a democracy is to protect the rights of the minority.

The fact that there are more women then men in this country doesn't mean that if a majority of the country voted the affirmative on the question "Should all assets of men be confiscated and redistributed to women?" that enacting the "will of the people" in this case would be furthering American democracy.

In the case of case of rights of gays to be married, the issue is more muddied, but to pretend that "if 51% of the country is against gay marriage then, by gum, democracy demands that gay marriage should be illegal" is clearly overly simplistic.

<<edit: I see that this argument was already made (although not addressed) my bad.>>

Last edited by mcsluggo; 02-14-2006 at 01:26 PM.
mcsluggo is offline   Reply With Quote