Thread: Dirk for MVP
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2006, 04:05 PM   #55
orangedays
Platinum Member
 
orangedays's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,938
orangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant futureorangedays has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blab's Nemesis
No question here. It is still Nash. Anyone who knows anything about b-ball in the NBA knows Nash is still MVP. But this forum has shown continuously that B-Ball IQ is not it's strength.

With that being said, Dirk is looking more like (can I say it) LARRY every night.
First, not a good way to start posting chump.

Second, it is facetious...no...downright ignorant of you to say that anyone who knows anything about basketball "knows Nash is still the MVP". Citing, verbatim, a number of well-respected people in the league and in the media - Nash isn't even the best player on his own team. Why is Brand receiving NBA recognition? Why is Billups? Why is Dirk? If your 'analysis' is accurate, it is apparently because a healthy chunk of people associated with NBA basketball are displaying horrendously low basketball IQ. Maybe you need to rethink your opinions.

If your best way of proving your point is making critical remarks about this board - run, don't walk, to your nearest store to get a clue.

Last edited by orangedays; 02-28-2006 at 04:06 PM.
orangedays is offline   Reply With Quote