odd, the article didn't mention ANY "backtracking" by Hillary, just the facts that Bill has been very close to the emirates, and that he has been an advisor to them.
is there some reason that hillary and bill cannot be on different sides of an issue? it seems that they may be on this one.
when there is something factual to the accusation let us know....
until then, it seems that hillary hasn't been "backtracking"" on anything regarding the DP world deal.
personally, imo she is on the wrong side of the issue. if she were to come out in favor, after being provided with info that would satisfy her concerns, would that be "backtracking" or would be evidence of an open mind and her willingness to compromise?
I'd go with the latter.
|