View Single Post
Old 03-07-2006, 11:08 AM   #12
Mavdog
Diamond Member
 
Mavdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,014
Mavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud ofMavdog has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kg_veteran
Let's be realistic. She doesn't have any personal beliefs about whether the ports deal is right or wrong, Mavdog. It's not like if she changes her stance it will be because of an "open mind" or "willingness to compromise." It will only be because public opinion has swayed back in the other direction. Her move was blatant and obvious pandering.
I agree in a large way kg, almost ALL of the politicos who have taken an adversarial position on the port sale are doing so to pander to the anti-arab sentiment that is an undercurrent of the public's opinion. Hillary is no different.

I do expect that Hillary, and several others who have been against the port deal, to change their positions as this unfolds.
Mavdog is offline   Reply With Quote