Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mavdog
no, you are wrong. the commission said NOTHING about this man. they made a judgement about the information they were given.
|
Semantics...what they said is that his assertion is full of crap.
Quote:
|
uh, colin powell used the words "regret" about his statements and that the Iraq presentation was a "blot on his record". he admits the information was bs, the fact you won't admit the same is a good question.
|
Again I'm not arguing that the intelligence was wrong, just that there wasn't some nefarious mission by the white house to overlook, hype or do anything other than act on the best intelligence they had. Again (and again and again and again) the same intelligence that every other country also believed.
Quote:
|
read the article again. the point was that the intelligence was NOT wrong. just ignored due to it not fitting the plan of "regime change". some of us are aware of that item, some of us want to act like it doesn't exist. you're clearly in the later camp. the ostrich camp...
|
And that is what I'm arguing about, that is the political assertion you are trying to make that is bs, always has been.
Quote:
"a nuke over NY"??? let's see, he had no nukes and we have no evidence he was aligned with terrorists. other than the facts being against you, I guess you have a point 
|
Clever "aligned" with terrorists. He had a terrorist training camp at salman pak(sp), he was paying suicide bombers, our (and the rest of the worlds..including the CIA's) said he had weapons programs.
Again..thank you lord, for keeping democrats out of the white house.