View Single Post
Old 05-09-2006, 04:39 PM   #52
rabbitproof
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: now, here
Posts: 7,720
rabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond reputerabbitproof has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Anytime you deviate from the traditional 1-2-3-4-5, you're going in the direction of 'small'. For example, a lineup with a center and four swingmen is 'small'. It's not as small as playing without a center but playing two points in the backcourt is 'smaller'. Maybe not 'small' per say but 'smaller'.

And I think it's an appropriate strategy. As much as we rave about our two/three headed beast at center - we have a 1-2 PG combo that's up there with anybody in the A, too. If the Spurs have to play Parker/NVE to counter, I'm more then fine.
__________________

watch your thoughts, they become your words
rabbitproof is offline   Reply With Quote