Pirate, yes I got your point. You don't care whether Josh is better or worse than Diaw. You're just trying to prove that the +/- stats by themselves don't conclusively prove anything... unless , of course, if we take into consideration the stats of the guys who are replacing these two.
And, I believe, we all agree with that. Our point is that the delta between the two replacements (Stack/Grif and KT/Jones) couldn't possibly be so high as to erase the original, high point difference.
Good discussion... thanks! I learnt a couple new stuff!!
|