View Single Post
Old 02-06-2007, 05:55 PM   #24
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

are you asking me?? I think they should actually support the troops.

Are you asking me if that would've been another way to "vote against bush's plan" then I say yes. They knew exactly what Petraeus was being put in place to do. If they had spine enough to stop this troop increase then they have plenty of methods. If they are just playing politics without wanting to commit to any kind of actual leadership, then a non-binding agreement is exactly the way they should "vote against bush's plan"
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote