Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

BaylorTMW · 05-08-2007, 10:20 AM

Wow, stupid is running amok around here...

1. O'Neal is a better post up player than Dirk. He would give us more of a low-post threat, but i do not think he fills the need perfectly. Also, he is really a PF who had to play the 5 for Indy.

2. Dirk and Terry for O'Neal and Tinsely is just flat wrong. Realistically, we are giving up the #1 and #3 talented player in that trade, for a big drop to #2 and #4....

3. YOU DON NOT TRADE DIRK FOR O'Neal. Sorry that just needed to be said again...

4. Devin Harris for Calderon? WHAT!?!?! i like the idea of a more traditional PG, but how does Calderon make us defensively better? He is a better defender than JET, but that really isnt saying too much.

05-08-2007, 10:20 AM	#42
BaylorTMW Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 53	Wow, stupid is running amok around here... 1. O'Neal is a better post up player than Dirk. He would give us more of a low-post threat, but i do not think he fills the need perfectly. Also, he is really a PF who had to play the 5 for Indy. 2. Dirk and Terry for O'Neal and Tinsely is just flat wrong. Realistically, we are giving up the #1 and #3 talented player in that trade, for a big drop to #2 and #4.... 3. YOU DON NOT TRADE DIRK FOR O'Neal. Sorry that just needed to be said again... 4. Devin Harris for Calderon? WHAT!?!?! i like the idea of a more traditional PG, but how does Calderon make us defensively better? He is a better defender than JET, but that really isnt saying too much. __________________ The hell???