Except that he doesn't explore Nash's supporting cast versus Duncan's and Dirk's. He only talks about Kobe (and what he *almost* did...yet, says the record, did not do) and his.
I hate it when people throw these kind of reductivist arguments out there: If Nash were better than Duncan or Dirk, his team would have won and not theirs. There is way, way more to it than that.
Last edited by chumdawg; 05-19-2007 at 10:29 PM.
|