View Single Post
Old 07-31-2007, 01:38 PM   #38
jthig32
Lazy Moderator
 
jthig32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lazytown
Posts: 18,721
jthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond reputejthig32 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

There are a whole lot of variables in the "best possible team for the Rangers".

If they had to field the current team for an entire season right now, then maybe the right move is to put Salty at 1B. But unless Laird shows signs of improving offensively some time soon, you could find any number of players to play first base and create a better offensive combination with Salty at catcher than a Salty/Laird combination would be.
__________________
Current Mavs Salary outlook (with my own possibly incorrect math and assumptions)

Mavs Net Ratings By Game
(Using BRef.com calculations for possessions, so numbers are slightly different than what you'll see on NBA.com and ESPN.com
jthig32 is offline   Reply With Quote