Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DevinFuture
Whether or not any country "believed" Saddam had WMD's is irrelevant. The point is that you can't act on such a belief by attacking a nation unless you can back it up with evidence. What you believe without evidence should not be a basis of attacking a nation and taking lives.
|
No it's quite relevant when you call other countries cronies, etc. and that dubya lied etc. It disproves that meme.
If the argument is that we should never have attacked them then that is another argument imo.
And if the argument STAYS on whether we should/should not stop Iran from having them that is another argument. Make your case, that's fine, but trying to make it by saying that someone lied about it Iraq, fooled someone (except saddam) is not a credible argument.
If the argument is that you must wait for a country to use a nuclear weapon before you believe they have one, then that is another argument.
My argument is that I would not allow a rogue nation to have a nuclear weapon. There is a debate to have, fine.