Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

TheKid · 07-18-2002, 09:04 AM

If they were to get Oak for cheap, I see NOTHING wrong with this signing.. It's no risk.. They got Manning for virtually nothing last year and he didn't work out so they let him go and the Mavs didn't take a big hit. They could sign Oak to a one year deal and see what happens... I think he would definately help.. Also the thought that he doesn't play defense as well as he use to or rebound as well as he use to, well maybe that's true but even with his diminished skills if he were to come here, he automatically would be the BEST LOW post defender and the teams second best rebounder.. So what does that say about our front line if he's bad??? I say SIGN HIM...

07-18-2002, 09:04 AM	#14
TheKid Diamond Member Join Date: Mar 2001 Posts: 3,109	If they were to get Oak for cheap, I see NOTHING wrong with this signing.. It's no risk.. They got Manning for virtually nothing last year and he didn't work out so they let him go and the Mavs didn't take a big hit. They could sign Oak to a one year deal and see what happens... I think he would definately help.. Also the thought that he doesn't play defense as well as he use to or rebound as well as he use to, well maybe that's true but even with his diminished skills if he were to come here, he automatically would be the BEST LOW post defender and the teams second best rebounder.. So what does that say about our front line if he's bad??? I say SIGN HIM... __________________ Ask not what you can do for your country but ask what you can do for THE KID!