View Single Post
Old 05-07-2008, 09:26 AM   #31
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirkadirkastan
There are WAY too many Matt's out there as it is.
That might be a good thing. These sorts of things come and go in waves. So choosing a name that's common now might be the same as choosing a name that will be uncommon in a decade or two. Everyone else right now is saying, "nah, too common." So by being the same, you'd be different. On the other hand, if you choose Maximillian, or Roderick, or Ratzinger, or Benedict, you'll probably be choosing one that willbe very common because everyone else is saying, "yeah, I'll choose that cause no one else uses it." THough you might run into issues of commonalities with some of those if you are Catholic. Of course, it might be possible to overthink the whole thing.


anyway, whatever the real name, a good nickname would be "LaFoul". Ooooooh! Zing!

Last edited by Usually Lurkin; 05-07-2008 at 09:28 AM.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote