Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thespiralgoeson
A lot better than Damp? He's a better shot-blocker and FT shooter and that's about it. Damp is a better defender and rebounder IMO. If we're going to trade for a center, it better be for someone who can score. Trading Damp for Dalembert is a lateral move.
|
Lateral move??? Dalembert is easily better than Dampier (especially at rebounding):
Dampier - 6.1 ppg / 7.5 rpg / 1.5 bpg / 24.4 mpg
Dalmbert - 10.5 ppg / 10.4 rpg / 2.3 bpg / 33.2 mpg
Above all else, Dalembert plays starter-minutes for starter-pay whereas Dampier plays back-up-minutes for starter-pay (that's my biggest beef with Damp...)
Someone suggested Damp & Bass for Dalembert, but that only seems worthwhile if we're really overrating Bass around here...