[dude1394]

How interesting. Love the title, it could be directly targeted at janet.

So one large reason for the high prices is that there isn't ENOUGH exxon-mobil running the socialist, nationalized oil fields.

Nice article with some interesting comparisons, especially of what's going on in china/india which imo is one of if not the biggest reason for the run-up in prices. There's been a tremendous amount of globalization in the last decade.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/b...on-stupid.aspx

Oil shock: China and Mexico, not Exxon, stupid
Posted: May 24, 2008, 10:00 AM by Diane Francis
Trends, Energy, Russia, U.S. Politics, Environment, China, Middle East


Supply-demand out of sync: Not enough exploration, drilling and reinvestment in the oil patch

The run-up in oil, commodity and food prices is not a bubble or conspiracy mounted by cartels or speculators or dictators or ethanol.
Exxon and OPEC bashing in Congress, and a host of populist musings in the media and blogosphere, have it all wrong. Washington's politicians and policy makers have been parochial and woefully ignorant of economic developments around the world. That is why their prescriptions are either paranoid or populist stupidity which do not address the issues.
Prices are soaring, in part, because oil is denominated in U.S. dollars and the dollar declines, thanks to Washington’s overspending on wars, trade, subsidies and government budgets. Investors have also abandoned credit markets, since the meltdown due to subprime scandals in August, and put their money into solid, real assets instead.
But the biggest reason prices have been soaring is that investors are now understanding the future supply and demand reality.

The demand side
China and India are undertaking a Marshall Plan every two years, building massive infrastructure, urbanizing their populations and industrializing. The Beijing Olympics will open the world's eyes to what is going on there this summer.
Recent estimates are that in the next 17 years, about 300 million Chinese living in rural areas will be moved to cities which have yet to be built. They will want roads, cars, buildings and streetlights. The equivalent of five New Yorks, and some 50,000 skyscrapers, are on the drawing boards. Already, some 174 subway systems are under construction and a power plant is completed every month. There are already 200 cities in China bigger than Dallas.
In addition are the economic development plans underway in Brazil, Central Europe, the Middle East and other parts of Asia. More than half of the world economy is now located in emerging, or poorer, countries.

U.S. prices still cheap
Prices are being driven upward because the world keeps buying this stuff even at these prices, both in rich and poor nations. In past times, when oil prices jumped this dramatically, there was a corresponding collapse in demand and accompanying price drop. Not this time because the price is not as high, in relative terms, as was US$36 a barrel oil in the early 1980s.
Even at $5 a gallon (which is what Canadians pay) or $7 a gallon (which is what the British pay) there will be plenty of Americans who will cling to their gasoline-guzzlers because they can afford to. Others, who cannot afford higher prices, will still have to use cars due to the fact that the U.S. is one giant, haphazard urban sprawl with minimal public transportation available.

How the other half lives is different too
Another reality is that even as prices go higher, cutbacks in usage and/or greater fuel efficiencies in rich countries like the U.S. will not offset the massive growth in consumption or the use of cars in the world’s emerging economies.
Right now, the U.S. has 250 million vehicles and China, 37 million. This gap will close over time. So will car ownership in other poor nations.
Ironically, the poorer these countries are the more they will increase demand by subsidizing energy use to help their economies, farmers, businesses and families.
Then there is the growing demand for energy and oil for power generation. On May 12, China announced it was increasing power consumption by 40% over the next three years, or 12% a year.

Currently, China is self sufficient in thermal coal but is maxed out in terms of domestic production at 2.5 billion tons per year. The supply-demand situation is tight: A 3% fall in Chinese coal production every year equates to 100% of either the U.S. or Australia’s total exports, the second and third largest in the world. In other words, the slack has been taken up in coal which means higher prices for coal and all energy commodities.

Supply is tight, the slack is gone
So the world is now in a situation where overall demand won’t decline, nor will prices, at the same time as huge new supplies cannot be unearthed. This is due to another irreversible trend: ownership of oil and other resources by foreign governments in Asia, the former Soviet Union, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America.
About 80% of the world’s oil supplies are owned by these inefficient or inept government corporations or agencies. They are not efficient, nor responsive to market conditions and are not devoted to replacing the resources they produce. Even if they are disciplined, they cannot pursue more reserves because they are used by governments as cash cows to buy votes or palaces or armies or terrorist attacks.

These government-controlled companies, unlike their private sector counterparts, fail to reinvest, explore, replace equipment or drill for more resources because they don't have to so supplies are not going to grow to meet increasing demand.
By contrast, private-sector oil or mining companies must find new reserves to replenish their inventories or their stocks fall as investors bail out.

One of the worst examples of public ownership of oil resources is Russia's Gazprom or Mexico’s Pemex. This company, owned by the federal government of Mexico, has not invested in growth with the result that its production has begun to dramatically decline despite the existence of huge potential reserves in the country. Pemex ships most of its cash flow to Mexico City which represents 40% of the federal government budget.

Rich countries' options
Congressional threats to sue OPEC will only make some American lawyers rich, not add supplies in order to push down prices. Removing gasoline taxes, as Hillary and McCain proposed, is simply another "subsidy" which will keep up demand by making gasoline cheaper to buy. Likewise, levying huge windfall-profits taxes on Exxon or other oil companies will merely aggravate the supply situation by reducing the cash they have with which to find and produce more oil.
This means the only sensible policies for the United States, Canada and other rich countries to adopt is for governments to impose, or reward, dramatic fuel efficiencies; to mandate hybrid vehicles; develop alternative energy sources and arrest urban sprawl as a means of enhancing urban density and the use of public transportation.