View Single Post
Old 08-12-2008, 12:25 AM   #61
Evilmav2
Diamond Member
 
Evilmav2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,788
Evilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond reputeEvilmav2 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flacolaco
No TE spot?

I'd say change one of those WR to strictly TE and you've got a deal, no?

(Mind you I've only done this twice before, so if I'm being ignorant just let me know)
Whoops... That was my oversight. With the TE we have a nice even 15 rounds with this:

QB, QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, WR, W/R, TE, DST, K + 4 bench spots

That kind of a lineup would make the FA pool run pretty darned thin in a 16 person league (not to mention the fact that we would run out of QB's), but I think we'd be able to facilitate free agency movement in our 12 team league pretty darned well with this set-up. So again, if folks are amenable, I'll be happy to make the change forthwith...
__________________
What has the sheep to bargain with the wolf?

Last edited by Evilmav2; 08-12-2008 at 12:28 AM.
Evilmav2 is offline   Reply With Quote