Dallas-Mavs.com Forums - View Single Post

jandrewill · 08-13-2008, 11:19 PM

^^
^^^^
^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^
^^^
^^^
^^^
^^^
^^^

seriously? youve got to be kidding me.
1. Clips arent gonna want to give Kaman away. They won't want howard cause this is Thortons season to blossom. Especially with baron there.
2. Why would the bulls want damps bad contract without getting rid of one of theirs? does hughes ring a bell?
3. you gotta be kidding me. so... youre trying to say that the 76ers are gonna have miller/terry backcourt. think about that.
4. most realistic scenario, but that is not saying much. even though its still a NO GO! ATL is really thin on PFs and Cs, there's no way theyd only want this for a budding Smith. if anything, Howard would have to be the focal point in the package. Also, there is no way we're trading freshly signed Diop.

08-13-2008, 11:19 PM	#130
jandrewill Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 2	^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ ^^^ seriously? youve got to be kidding me. 1. Clips arent gonna want to give Kaman away. They won't want howard cause this is Thortons season to blossom. Especially with baron there. 2. Why would the bulls want damps bad contract without getting rid of one of theirs? does hughes ring a bell? 3. you gotta be kidding me. so... youre trying to say that the 76ers are gonna have miller/terry backcourt. think about that. 4. most realistic scenario, but that is not saying much. even though its still a NO GO! ATL is really thin on PFs and Cs, there's no way theyd only want this for a budding Smith. if anything, Howard would have to be the focal point in the package. Also, there is no way we're trading freshly signed Diop. Last edited by jandrewill; 08-13-2008 at 11:41 PM.