Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rabbitproof
Lol at your percentages. I'll just be fair and say they're all attacking ads. Cmon, we all have preferences here but to think either of them are investing dollars and tv time to NOT take down their opponent is incredibly naive or biased.
|
um, lol at your butt?
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/...gative_ads.php
there is an objective way to look at this stuff, and "they're all attack ads" is not it.
Candidates do run attack ads, and the ads do a good job, and to a point they are helpful, cause no candidate is going to tell the public about their own downside. But candidates could spend some time and money using ads to tell people about themselves as well.
Quote:
|
Why DID the market rebound? Could it be the news of government intervention and regulation? Interestinggg.. so, which candidate is touting more regulation? Hmmmmm...
|
well, in order to answer that, people would have to be listening to what the candidates are saying as well as making judgments about what they think the economy is doing.