Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dude1394
So if left leaning sites believe that obama criticism is weak, wrong, etc., then the authors should be shouted down.
I don't really know how wrong/right it is (nor do you I imagine unless you've read it) but if anyone dares criticize the one, we do know that his campaign will try to shout them off the stage. With meet-up help from the obama campaign.
In general I don't feel that the national review magazine is a screaming right-wing rag. If you do then you do. Seeing as how both of those authors are respected contributors to that magazine, then I believe that the smear that is being perpetrated is by obama and yourself.
|
if there are errors and an agenda, imo the author should be confronted and challenged. if there's "shouting", does it matter? the line drawn is when the author is not allowed to publish or to speak. did that happen?
you are hung up with that word-"shout"-like it means "silence". it's not.
if you "don't feel that the national review magizine is a screaming (isn't "screaming" the same as "shout" btw) right-wing rag", well, it is...maybe the problem is those blinders you're fond of wearing.