this seems contradictory, the article says "According to Ken, the Obama campaign has raised nearly half a billion dollars ($429.6M) but refuses to provide the names of most of the donors", but then the article proceeds to name donors such as "Good Will" and "Doodad Pro". apparently the obama campaign has provided names of donors, right?
it seems to me that this is a problem resulting from the use of the internet to receive campaign contributions. it is difficult to acheive very much oversight when the $ are taken electronically, and there needs to be some way established to accomplish this function. don't have an answer but there clearly is a need.
|