Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Usually Lurkin
Even if the Article 1 thing is a flub, Joe must know this about the role, right?
|
I may have mistaken where you were coming from. No, it was not at all a flub. And the question--as much as I know you might not like it, given your views on Ifill--was clearly (at least, to those who have followed the issue) meant to address the issue of Cheney's perhaps unConstitutional interpretation of the office.
Cheney has raised a Constitutional issue in the way that he has treated the office.
It is an undecided issue.
That's what Ifill was getting at.