View Single Post
Old 10-23-2008, 10:59 AM   #21
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog View Post
this is a major issue that is a consequence of the rise in online contributions. the amount of money that has been given and spent by the two campaigns....
this problem is not shared by both campaigns.

Quote:
should the obama campaign be more aggressive in finding these situations? absolutely, but it is a case of reacting more than anything else.
I'm not an expert, either, if this poster at theCorner (who deals with online credit card contributiosn) is correct, then the Obama campaign has been proactive in this, not reactive:
Quote:
In order to accept financial donations from "John Galt" and "Saddam Hussein", whoever runs the Obama website would have to modify the default security checks required by their merchant processor.

Last edited by Usually Lurkin; 10-23-2008 at 10:59 AM.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote