View Single Post
Old 10-23-2008, 11:31 AM   #26
Usually Lurkin
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,195
Usually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond reputeUsually Lurkin has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog View Post
the problem of the amount of money spent by the two campaigns is shared. this race will have more than $1 billion...say that again, ONE BILLION...spent.

it's obscene.
yes, but one campaign is undeniably more obscene even in that respect. But we are talking about credit card fraud in this thread, and Obama's campaign seems to have a problem where McCain does not.


Quote:
typically the business gets approval for a transaction if the amount is greater than x. there have been a majority of contributions less than that amount.
great. If that poster is correct, then Obama's campaign had to remove security - presumably knowing that they would be facilitating fraud. They acted. Before money came in. That is pro-active.They acted on the principle that more money is more important than more security. I don't see why a candidate that campaigns according to this principle wouldn't also collect taxes under that principle.
Usually Lurkin is offline   Reply With Quote