View Single Post
Old 11-12-2008, 05:04 PM   #7
dalmations202
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Just outside the Metroplex
Posts: 5,539
dalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond reputedalmations202 has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavdog View Post
I've yet to hear a single valid reason that our criminal justice system should not be handling these cases.
They were not arrested in the United States by United States Federal Law.
They are not under Federal Law, and never have been by the US.
They were detained and are held under the Unified Code of Military Justice.
They have no bearing on the US Constitution or US Laws as they were not detained or arrested in the US or for breaking laws within the boundaries of the United States.

The REASON they shouldn't be charged or handled with the civilian criminal justice system is because they were never in the US and were never under US LAW.

They should be tried in a military court by people who understand the UCMJ. Admittedly though it should be cleaner and quicker.
__________________


"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have". Gerald Ford

"Life's tough, it's even tougher if you're stupid." -John Wayne

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order.
-Capt. Bob "Wolf" Johnson
dalmations202 is offline   Reply With Quote