View Single Post
Old 11-19-2008, 07:33 PM   #16
wmbwinn
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,043
wmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalmations202 View Post
If you don't bail them out, along with the layoffs from the oil field industry (gas going back down, less drilling) -- then unemployment and major retirement packages are going to be gone. Government will end up either bailing out the companies, or bailing out the individuals via unemployment packages, etc.

I don't see a win win -- it is either lose, lose or lose, lose, IMO.
a managed bancruptcy with assistance from Uncle Sam can prevent some of the problems you predicted. But, a bancruptcy has the advantage of killing the union. If Uncle Sam won't finance the start up after bancruptcy due to a union contract that prevents the Big 3 from competing with the international economy, then the union contract will be forcibly scrapped.

It is not in Uncle Sam's interest to see the Big 3 die. See Buchanon's article. But, a managed bancruptcy with assistance from Uncle Sam with a re-structuring to a successful viable model is what is needed.
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson
wmbwinn is offline   Reply With Quote