View Single Post
Old 12-04-2008, 11:00 PM   #4
wmbwinn
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,043
wmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud ofwmbwinn has much to be proud of
Default

Flaco, I would assume you were right. But, if the SCOTUS is considering it, does that mean there might be something to it?

I mean, think about it: What if Obama is constitutionally barred from being President? Who is President then? Is Biden President? Do we have to have another quick election cycle? What happens?

I have read about this before and always assumed that there was nothing to it. But... if the SCOTUS is going to consider it... what does that mean?
__________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson
wmbwinn is offline   Reply With Quote